|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.misc (General Car Discussions) (uk.rec.cars.misc) |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 24th 10, 03:42 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Remind me why we need all the emissions guff?
Adrian wrote:
0.15% CO, 74ppm HC. Not bad for a 140k mile 1100cc Pug on a carb, eh? Lean burn technology was threatening to make cars too economical (for the oil companies), hence "something had to be done". Only half joking... Tim 
|
|
August 24th 10, 05:55 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
Remind me why we need all the emissions guff?
On 24/08/2010 14:52, Adrian wrote:
0.15% CO, 74ppm HC. Not bad for a 140k mile 1100cc Pug on a carb, eh? My Capri wasn't far off although to be fair, it was a recon engine. -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk
|
|
August 24th 10, 11:43 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
Remind me why we need all the emissions guff?
Adrian wrote:
0.15% CO, 74ppm HC. Not bad for a 140k mile 1100cc Pug on a carb, eh? I'm not playing this game. -- Pete M - OMF#9 "A one man Top Gear Challenge."
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
