|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.misc (General Car Discussions) (uk.rec.cars.misc) |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
February 19th 10, 05:44 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
|
|
February 19th 10, 05:49 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLE MANUFACTURED IN 2010.
"boyari2" wrote in message ... NICE, HUH? http://surftofind.com/dodge Any worthy rivals? rather slab-sided.
|
|
February 19th 10, 05:55 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
Ray O'Hara wrote:
"boyari2" wrote in message ... NICE, HUH? http://surftofind.com/dodge Any worthy rivals? rather slab-sided. http://www.ridelust.com/wp-content/u...ng_large_1.jpg
|
|
February 19th 10, 05:56 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
boyari2 gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying: NICE, HUH? http://surftofind.com/dodge No. It's a heap of bland, lardy, vaguely "retro" ****e, lobbed together badly by overpaid ****wits. It'll be completely unsellable in 99.5% of countries in the world - so it's probably as well that they won't even try. Any worthy rivals? Almost anything.
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:04 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
Conscience wrote:
On 2010-02-19 09:49:32 -0800, "Ray O'Hara" said: "boyari2" wrote in message ... NICE, HUH? http://surftofind.com/dodge Any worthy rivals? rather slab-sided. Drive one. It's like looking over a football field to see the road ahead. Astroturf, not even real grass...
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:04 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLE MANUFACTURED IN 2010.
In message
, boyari2 writes NICE, HUH? As you ask..... it looks ****. http://surftofind.com/dodge Any worthy rivals? Yeah, anything from the 70's. -- Paul Giverin My Photos:- www.pbase.com/vendee
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:21 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
In any model year, the most attractive for me would be the cheapest,
with power NOTHING, computer-controlled NOTHING, manual EVERYTHING, lots of headroom and legroom, analogue sweep dials, no check lights. Airbags okay. If a manufacturer would build that car, I would then and only then consider "aesthetics".
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:28 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLEMANUFACTURED IN 2010.
Not Leonard Cohen gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying: In any model year, the most attractive for me would be the cheapest, with power NOTHING, computer-controlled NOTHING, manual EVERYTHING, lots of headroom and legroom, analogue sweep dials, no check lights. Airbags okay. If a manufacturer would build that car, I would then and only then consider "aesthetics". Basic-spec Toyota Aygo/Pug 107/Cit C1. Power steering & ABS/EBD/CSC (ESP is an option), unfortunately, but that's about your lot as far as toys go. Even got keep-fit windows. The other option, of course, is to go _properly_ retro. I've been giving 'erselfs 20yo Pug 205 a hoof today. If it was a 1.0, instead of 1.1, it wouldn't even have servo brakes. Good fun to lob about, and only cost us a hundred quid.
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:37 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLE MANUFACTURED IN 2010.
Not Leonard Cohen wrote:
In any model year, the most attractive for me would be the cheapest, with power NOTHING, computer-controlled NOTHING, manual EVERYTHING, lots of headroom and legroom, analogue sweep dials, no check lights. Airbags okay. If a manufacturer would build that car, I would then and only then consider "aesthetics". Sounds like a several Korean box wagons. Might need downgrading slightly, gaffer over the check lights for instance but otherwise your in luck. -- Bigbird # You'll be laughing when I'm dead!
|
|
February 19th 10, 06:56 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.ford,alt.autos.toyota,rec.autos.sport.f1,aus.cars
|
|||
|
|||
|
WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLE MANUFACTURED IN 2010.
"boyari2" wrote ... NICE, HUH? http://surftofind.com/dodge Any worthy rivals? any european sports car... or japanese... in short, anything not redneck looking... FB
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
