![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.misc (General Car Discussions) (uk.rec.cars.misc) |
| Tags: tachometer |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Doki" wrote in message ... "Marlon" wrote in message ... Hi all, having just swapped an automatic for a manual, I now have gears and a tachometer as controllable variables in my driving. So it occured to me that I've never really done that bloke thing of knowing about rev ranges, when "best" to change gear (other than when it feels "right"), and such like. So.... for instance, given there's an obvious upper range to be avoided (as indicated by red lines), is there actually a practical lower limit (obviously without stalling)? Is there a "sweet spot" in between? Is it possible to determine at what amount of revs a particular engine is theoretically "best" at - and would "best" be defined in terms of fuel economy or some other operating measure? I'd imagine that any such measures would vary according to the vehicle (& engine size). Is it obvious where I'm coming from, or should I just go get on with enjoying driving without worrying about such stuff ![]() In general, try and stay above 1500 revs. You can get away with lower revs if you're trundling at low speed and have a relatively large engine, but labouring the engine is a bad thing. Labouring is indicated by funny noises... Labouring is when the engine does not respond immediately to an increase in throttle angle. Tim. |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
Mike G wrote:
In almost every car I have driven the maximum power is achived just before the rev limiter. I seriously doubt that. IME max power can be as much as 1k revs below peak revs. Max torque below that. This is only the case if the inlet/exhaust restrictions are the limiting factor, otherwise the redline / rev limit are chosen based on the maximum piston acceleration - the bearing loadings due to piston acceleration increase as the square of the engine RPM. If you want to increase power without increasing capacity, you improve intake and exhaust and increase rev-limit, at the expense of increased bearing loadings and reduced reliability. I have heard that on old cars the size of the inlets were the limiting factor at high revs, and so power would drop. I have never had anything like that. What sort of cars do you drive, and were is their peak power? On my car, 528i BMW. Max revs can go to 6,500 for short periods, about 6,250 sustained. Max power is delivered at 5,300, max torque at 3,950. Mike. The BMW 2.8 engine deliberately has a restrictive inlet - reputedly to preventing approaching the 3.0 lump for peak power output. A common tweak is to swap it for the much less resitrictive inlet from the 2.5. The point is that it isn't a good example of a 'normal' engine - many do indeed produce max power very close to max rpm/redline |
|
|||
|
On 7 Aug, 20:52, "Tim.." wrote:
Labouring is when the engine does not respond immediately to an increase in throttle angle. Tim So does that mean that you were harming the engine before you increased the throtle, even though it was not making any funny noises or anything? Or is the damage only likely to occur at those revs once you use more throtle? |
|
|||
|
Yup. It isn't that long ago to a time when tachometers were only fitted in
'sports' or more expensive cars as std equipment. They have little practical use. Mike. I find them useful - 1.3 Astras rev to 8000rpm!!! Easy to do if they rev there and you just got off a bike with a 10,000rpm red line |
|
|||
|
I seriously doubt that. IME max power can be as much as 1k revs below peak
revs. Max torque below that. Hillman/Chrysler/Talbot 1600 red line 6000rpm High torque max power 69bhp at 4800rpm - will not red line Normal 80bhp and something like 5800rpm Tiger (saloon) or Ti (hatch) 100bhp at 6100rpm (in the red!) My tuned 1600 came off cam at 7200rpm Didn't worry, a 66.7mm stroke should be safe |
|
|||
|
Martin wrote:
Yup. It isn't that long ago to a time when tachometers were only fitted in 'sports' or more expensive cars as std equipment. They have little practical use. Mike. I find them useful - 1.3 Astras rev to 8000rpm!!! Easy to do if they rev there and you just got off a bike with a 10,000rpm red line I've seen 7500rpm on the tacho of a 1.1 Renault 4 a few times! Mike P |
|
|||
|
Mike P wrote:
Martin wrote: Yup. It isn't that long ago to a time when tachometers were only fitted in 'sports' or more expensive cars as std equipment. They have little practical use. Mike. I find them useful - 1.3 Astras rev to 8000rpm!!! Easy to do if they rev there and you just got off a bike with a 10,000rpm red line I've seen 7500rpm on the tacho of a 1.1 Renault 4 a few times! Mike P That should be " a tacho dangling under the dashboard of my mates Renault 4 when I was a student". It'd indicate overr 45mph in 1st if you kept your toe down. It never, ever broke in two years of this treatment either! Mike P |
|
|||
|
Easy to do if they rev there and you just got off a bike with a
10,000rpm red line I've seen 7500rpm on the tacho of a 1.1 Renault 4 a few times! I have over revved a few cars when getting off a bike, too easy - drove a 1600 Sierra which has a very low red line even though it is short stroke, I had just got off a 12,500 red line like, 7000rpm is reachable! |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:02:05 -0700 (PDT), Dave
wrote: On 7 Aug, 20:52, "Tim.." wrote: Labouring is when the engine does not respond immediately to an increase in throttle angle. Tim So does that mean that you were harming the engine before you increased the throtle, even though it was not making any funny noises or anything? Or is the damage only likely to occur at those revs once you use more throtle? It's peak cylinder pressure that does the damage. Part throttle means the cylinder doesn't fill completely or in a Diesel only a small amount of fuel is injected so the contition that causes damage isn't present. Damage is actually unlikely unless sustained and lack of response will tell you stop but high fuel consumption is penalty. -- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets! |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Dave
wrote: - Engine damage occurs over about 0.5k over the red line. Unless really critical, do not use the revs above this. Most modern cars have rev limiters that prevent going much over the red line anyway. It's not immediate de-arrangement (well yes it is with OHV pushrod motors) but the initiation of small cracks in pistons and rods that grow with every rev. It takes time at high rpm/load for those to grow to the point at which engine integrity is compromised. Nissan 1800cc CA18DET has a 7,200 rpm redline for UK market, the N/A version the CA18DE in Japan has a 7,700 rpm redline. Bottom end is identical. I don't know what they ran it to in Japanese F3 but it should have been over 8K. 1972 Honda 350 K4 twin had a 9,500 rpm redline. Production race kit was a pair of exhaust pipes, pair of carbs, pair of high comp pistons, a cam, valve springs and a 14,000 rpm tachometer. They run to over 11,000 rpm in classic racing. 1974 Honda CB125S has a 9,500 redline on a 12,000 rpm tachometer. Over 18,000 miles in 18 months I saw 12,000 on 3 occasions (in top!). A car magazine did their utmost to kill one. Eventually they put it on the stand, then held the throttle wide open with no load, the rod ventilated the crankcase at 17,000 rpm. Obviously exploring the red zone means the warranty is void and expected life is one race season ~ 2000 miles. Annual rebuild requires new pistons and rods. -- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|