|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.maintenance (Car Maintenance) (uk.rec.cars.maintenance) |
| Tags: anybody, benefit, crime, should |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 27th 09, 09:13 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
Why should anybody benefit from crime?
Is this just a way of getting the public on board for a dubious scheme?
As I understand it, there does not need to be a court judgement; just 'unaccounted for' assets. If such assets were seized, should the holder not be arrested and have his day in court? What else would be the status the asset holder? Is he lumped with a criminal record even if there has been no Court judgement? If the assets were from crimes, then why are they not either 1) given back to their owners or if this is not possible, then simply destroyed; cars crushed etc. Why should anyone benefit from 'crime'? 
|
| Ads |
|
June 27th 09, 09:14 PM
posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why should anybody benefit from crime?
johannes wrote: Is this just a way of getting the public on board for a dubious scheme? As I understand it, there does not need to be a court judgement; just 'unaccounted for' assets. If such assets were seized, should the holder not be arrested and have his day in court? What else would be the status the asset holder? Is he lumped with a criminal record even if there has been no Court judgement? If the assets were from crimes, then why are they not either 1) given back to their owners or if this is not possible, then simply destroyed; cars crushed etc. Why should anyone benefit from 'crime'? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8119563.stm
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
