![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.maintenance (Car Maintenance) (uk.rec.cars.maintenance) |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:48:17 +0000, Willy Eckerslyke
wrote: shazzbat wrote: "Mrcheerful" wrote in message ... The Real Doctor wrote: On 24 Mar, 19:02, "reg" wrote: Towbars will now become a testable item in the test for classes 3,4,5, & 7. What counts as a towbar? If the hitch is removed, is it still testable? the test is only going to be for safety of attachment to the vehicle IIUC Which is a shame, because it will leave us with the "car indicating right, trailer indicating left" dipsticks, Isn't that already illegal? If laws aren't enforced, there's not a lot of point making new ones to try to correct the situation. FWIW my electric car didn't need an MOT because (partly I guess) they wouldn't know how to test it properly and there weren't that many about at the time (20 years ago). Anyone know if that's still the case? Also FWIW I still run the trailer I built over 30 years ago and treat that in the same way as I did the EV or any other thing I have on the public highway in that I try to ensure it's up to spec etc. I think the legislation for un powered domestic stuff (unlike HGV trailers etc) would be tricky as where would you stop ... cycles and disability scooters next? ;-) T i m |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:21:39 -0000, Willy Eckerslyke
wrote: Conor wrote: "Willy Eckerslyke" wrote in message ... Conor wrote: If you're equating dodgy trailer electrics with bald tyres, then you're the one who's missing the point. Tell that to the people who end up running into the rear of trailers because of faulty lights. And how often does that happen? I put it to you that if there's really a significant number of accidents involving trailers (which I doubt), then the majority of cases will have nothing to do with faults with the trailer itself, but were caused by overloading, uneven loading, speeding or sheer driver incompetence. None of which will be solved by testing the trailer. And if you think an annual test will ensure that trailer lights will work correctly for a year, you've clearly never owned a trailer. And if you think an MOT guarantees a car is safe for a year, you've obviously not got a clue. The point that you clearly can't grasp, is that the electrics on any trailer that's stored outside are hugely unreliable so there's no substitute for checking that all the lights work every time it's used. An MOT test will achieve nothing. If anything, it will have a negative effect as owners will be less likely to bother to check their lights as "it passed last week, so must be alright". The _only_ way to cut down on trailers with defective lights, is to enforce the law and educate people to check them regularly. That doesn't need new or revised legislation. Well the only accident I know of involing a trailer was when a wheel fell off. When I used to have to tow oother peoples trailers regularly I just gave up expecting them to work (most common failure seemed to be crushing the cable) & bought my own towboard. |
|
|||
|
"Adrian" wrote in message ... "Mark" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/ne...00/7961224.stm Bit early for 1st April. Very poor bit of image manipulation. No, it's real... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03...shire_mansion/ We'll see. Looks a well flakey grey background image laid on that roof to me, not even crisp edges, but we will see. Mark |
|
|||
|
Conor wrote:
If you're equating dodgy trailer electrics with bald tyres, then you're the one who's missing the point. Tell that to the people who end up running into the rear of trailers because of faulty lights. And how often does that happen? In rural areas? Enough. I live in a rural area and don't remember hearing of any accidents involving trailers. There have been plenty of others though. I put it to you that if there's really a significant number of accidents involving trailers (which I doubt), then the majority of cases will have nothing to do with faults with the trailer itself, but were caused by overloading, uneven loading, speeding or sheer driver incompetence. None of which will be solved by testing the trailer. Did you actually read what I posted? Sadly, I did. Can't say it was the high point of my day. The point that you clearly can't grasp, is that the electrics on any trailer that's stored outside are hugely unreliable so there's no substitute for checking that all the lights work every time it's used. No disputing of the fact. An MOT test will achieve nothing. If anything, it will have a negative effect as owners will be less likely to bother to check their lights as "it passed last week, so must be alright". With many, an MOT check will be one more than they'd normally get. With many, it would be a pointless, time wasting and needlessly costly incumberance. Now if you actually came up with some statistics showing that there's a genuine problem that needs correcting, I might see a justification. But only if a workable system could be introduced that would actually make a difference. So far, nothing you've said persuades me at all. |
|
|||
|
"Adrian" wrote in message ... "Mill Autos" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: Yo Cock, I'm on the sauce tonight due to a toothache. Clearly. Hello, TeflonMorphBoi. Get ****ed you dopey **** is this your house? http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/ne...00/7961224.stm Wish it was. That's a rather nice house. Shame I'm to simple to ever earn enough money to afford it. Fair comment. |
|
|||
|
On 25 Mar, 15:11, "shazzbat"
wrote: Which is a shame, because it will leave us with the "car indicating right, trailer indicating left" dipsticks... There is no need to have any lights at all on a trailer, as I recall. Ian |
|
|||
|
On 26 Mar, 12:14, Willy Eckerslyke wrote:
I live in a rural area and don't remember hearing of any accidents involving trailers. There have been plenty of others though. We get 'em all the time in my rural area. Almost invariably it's ****wits in HGVs going round corners faster than centrifugal force thinks reasonable. Ian |
|
|||
|
"The Real Doctor" wrote in message ... On 25 Mar, 21:58, Adrian wrote: Trailers should be registered and tested. How big is the problem of unroadworthy trailers? You presumably don't live near the coast. I live near Poole, and I can tell you that through the summer, hardly ever a weekend goes past without a boat trailer shedding a wheel and bringing the A31/M27 to a grinding halt. Add to that the caravans which do the same thing bcause "we've only used it for a fortnight a year and the odd bank holiday weekend for the last ten years, so there can't be anything wrong with it". Plus the aforementioned orange box on two wheels variety, and yes there is quite a problem. Don't ask me for statistics. Last year one had the outer part of a wheel come off, leaving the centre disc part of the wheel still held firmly on by it's wheel nuts. There was an upside to that one though, because the owner got some nasty cuts to his hand in picking up the wheel, so he may have learned his lesson. Steve |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:01:59 -0000, "Conor"
wrote: "asahartz" wrote in message .. . A test for trailers would only be workable if they also had a registration scheme. Which is the case in France... Yet strangely there's an MOT test for HGV trailers......I wonder what they use. Oh yeah, chassis numbers recorded on a database. Except that many trailers don't even have chassis numbers. -- asahartz woz ere |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|