![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.fuel.lpg (Cars Running LPG) (uk.rec.cars.fuel.lpg) |
| Tags: duty, lpg, rise |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article , Steve Firth
writes John Beardmore wrote: There seem to be some indicators that power station size fuel cells may be around in 10 years time, so the energy storage problem may get solved. What? You seriously think that fuel cells are more efficient than pump-storage? Probably. Electrolysis can be better than 90% efficient. Fuel cells about 60% but getting a lot better. By the time the units I'm referring to are shipping, better than 90% seems to be indicated. What do you get out of pumped storage ? Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
In article , Austin Shackles
writes On or around Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:02:49 +0000, John Beardmore enlightened us thusly: ISTR that there's a place in France where they have an 12-tonne flywheel (or thereabouts) as a power storage device. Commonly used in French phone exchanges I understand. Not sure of details, nor of how you get power out of it effectively. Coils and magnets I expect. There seem to be some indicators that power station size fuel cells may be around in 10 years time, so the energy storage problem may get solved. fuel cells don't store power though. No. See other message for mention of electrolysis. They generate more efficiently from fossil fuels than some conventional systems - Doesn't help much if used like that though. One scenario is that you strip hydrogen out of oil or gas, use the hydrogen in fuel cells and burn the more carbon rich hydrocarbon in the usual way elsewhere. The fuel cell concept is supposed to generate at about 90% efficiency I think, maybe more these days. Probably optimistic at the moment ? The above, coupled with the growth in the output of WT plant suggests to me that you may be very wrong indeed in about a decade. I take it you don't mean Wireless Telegrpahy... Water Turbine I suppose. Correct. but none of the "intermittent" class of renewable generators will work without truly big electricity storage. Which is likely to be available by then. And you've a problem from the outset there, in that the distribution system (rightly) runs on AC, so you can't use simple storage batteries without inverters, which are of course inefficient. Modern inverters can be surprisingly efficient and large. Some WTs output to the grid via switch mode electronics which handles power factor correction and safety protocols. The 'electronics pack' on an Enercon E66 for example can be thought of as an efficient 1.8MW power conditioning 3 phase inverter with an 11 or 33kV output depending on the line it's connected to. With this sort of kit getting more common, I don't think grid connection of energy stores is going to be a huge issue. Actually, the pumped storage method isn't too silly, really, but it tends to require a lot of space. Yes, the hell of a lot ! Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|