![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: polarity, pre, rovers, voltage, war |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Chris Bolus wrote: On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:49:43 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Richard Green wrote: I've never been clear whether car electronics are made with negative earth because they have to be, or purely through convention, most cars having negative earth when they were introduced. Certainly some of the early radio/cassette players and accessory rev counters were switchable. The first transistors were geranium and PNP so basically positive ground. Not all. When I was doing a lot of electronics in the 70s, one of the most common transistors was the AC128 - an NPN germanium. Indeed. I was generalising. But PNP transistors were the norm with geranium in the same way as NPN is the norm with silicon. If you look at a catalogue from the '60s you'll see that NPN were rare and expensive. (FWIW they're now very sought-after by guitar fx builders!) That says much about their performance. ;-) And very expensive. Silicon ones are NPN and negative ground - and they're also very much cheaper to manufacture. Or were when they arrived. But of course, apart from where heatsinking is required, there is no need to connect any part of the transistor to ground. So an electronic circuit board can be made with any polarity provided insulating mounts are used. So by and large it's convention. Cars use the chassis as one leg of the supply. So anything which had peripherals - like injection etc - would have to use fully insulated sensors with wired returns. -- *I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
Thank you all very much. The consensus appears to be 12 volt Positive
earth. I appreciate the response. I am in USA and have wanted a pre war Rover 10 or 12 for years. Having seen one advertised (in the UK) I was interested in some of the details I had not explored before before I took the plunge abnd contacted the seller Thanks a lot On Sep 8, 8:03*am, JHB wrote: Hi: Does anyone off hand know the voltage and polarity of the pre war Rover electrical systems? Thanks John Baker |
|
|||
|
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Richard Green wrote: Pre-war Rovers used negative earth until part-way through the 1936 model year, when they changed to positive earth. All models used conventional earth return through the chassis. It's interesting that at least some of their models reverted to negative earth long before electronics made this necessary. And of course Rolls Royce stayed with negative earth. Hello Dave, I've never been clear whether car electronics are made with negative earth because they have to be, or purely through convention, most cars having negative earth when they were introduced. Certainly some of the early radio/cassette players and accessory rev counters were switchable. Regards, Richard Tuesday 09/09/2008, 16:18 Looking for something completeyly different I came across this in "Automobile Electrical Maintenance" published in 1938. ----------------------- Positive Earthing Hitherto it has been the custom in single-pole systems to earth the negative pole of the battery to the chassis frame. More recently, however, it has become the practice to earth the positive terminal since there are certain advantages in the latter method. In the first place the h.t. distributor arm of the ignition unit becomes negative to the distributor contacts so that it does not burn away as before. Secondly, the central electrode of the sparking plug is now negative to the metal shell of the plug, so that any corrosion, or burning away, is now confined to the metal shell and not to the central electrode. Another advantage lies in the relatively lower temperature of the central electrode, whereby a lower "high tension" voltage can be employed to produce the spark. ----------------- I understand some of the reasoning but not the bit about lower voltage. Malcolm |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Malcolm wrote: Looking for something completeyly different I came across this in "Automobile Electrical Maintenance" published in 1938. ----------------------- Positive Earthing Hitherto it has been the custom in single-pole systems to earth the negative pole of the battery to the chassis frame. More recently, however, it has become the practice to earth the positive terminal since there are certain advantages in the latter method. In the first place the h.t. distributor arm of the ignition unit becomes negative to the distributor contacts so that it does not burn away as before. Secondly, the central electrode of the sparking plug is now negative to the metal shell of the plug, so that any corrosion, or burning away, is now confined to the metal shell and not to the central electrode. Another advantage lies in the relatively lower temperature of the central electrode, whereby a lower "high tension" voltage can be employed to produce the spark. ----------------- I understand some of the reasoning but not the bit about lower voltage. I suppose it means if there's less erosion you don't need as high a voltage to cope with an increased gap - or that resistance increases with temperature. But a bit tenuous. I've a feeling that the above article misses out that positive earth increases body corrosion for the reasons given. -- *The man who fell into an upholstery machine is fully recovered* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Malcolm wrote: Looking for something completeyly different I came across this in "Automobile Electrical Maintenance" published in 1938. ----------------------- Positive Earthing Hitherto it has been the custom in single-pole systems to earth the negative pole of the battery to the chassis frame. More recently, however, it has become the practice to earth the positive terminal since there are certain advantages in the latter method. In the first place the h.t. distributor arm of the ignition unit becomes negative to the distributor contacts so that it does not burn away as before. Secondly, the central electrode of the sparking plug is now negative to the metal shell of the plug, so that any corrosion, or burning away, is now confined to the metal shell and not to the central electrode. Another advantage lies in the relatively lower temperature of the central electrode, whereby a lower "high tension" voltage can be employed to produce the spark. ----------------- I understand some of the reasoning but not the bit about lower voltage. I suppose it means if there's less erosion you don't need as high a voltage to cope with an increased gap - or that resistance increases with temperature. But a bit tenuous. I've a feeling that the above article misses out that positive earth increases body corrosion for the reasons given. -- ISTR that the issue of body corrosion due to polarity was not generally recognised in the thirties; it was only some years after the war that it was confirmed as an issue and the general move back to negative earth occurred. Of course, BMC took a novel approach by fitting sacrificial anodes. They called them doorhandles. GMacK |
|
|||
|
The Rover 10, 12 & 16hp saloons & sports were 12volt positive earth
according to wiring diagrams which I have. "JHB" wrote in message ... Hi: Does anyone off hand know the voltage and polarity of the pre war Rover electrical systems? Thanks John Baker |
|
|||
|
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Roger saying something like: I thought that pre-war Beetles was a bit optimistic but a quick google brought up the information that there were a few pre production prototype Beetles made before war broke out. Production was actually scheduled to begin in September 1939. Istr reading that the very first production models were presented to selected 'winners' of a lottery (fixed, I've no doubt) in various local ceremonies held througout the Reich, as an incentive for the workers to keep putting money into the VW pot. Of course, such events were thoroughly covered by Joe Goebbels at the time and the cars were taken back as soon as the cameras left, to be 'presented' to the next lucky winner, on the promise that as soon as production really got going they'd get a new car - real soon now. There was some sort of workers' fund set up to produce the Beetle and if the war hadn't happened the production VWs would have been filling the streets, driven by grinning family men as they drove their flaxen-headed Hans and Heidis to Youth Camp. -- Dave SE6a |
|
|||
|
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Geoff Mackenzie" saying something like: Of course, BMC took a novel approach by fitting sacrificial anodes. They called them doorhandles. Or subframes. -- Dave SE6a |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|