![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: work |
|
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article ,
ian wrote: An elderly relative has just given me a an Austin Mini 1000 City E, First Registered in April 1986 and with only Nineteen Thousand miles on it. This is genuine since it comes with old MOTs. Only one previous owner and she bought it from new. It has been in a dry garage for the last three years and has only done 887 miles since it passed its MOT in 2004. It currently starts and runs without any trouble. Since I'm a bit short of cash at the moment I would like to sell it straightaway, but am unsure whether to sell it as it is (some surface body work in places, see car front on website photo): http://i5.tinypic.com/6jakcph.jpg Or to try to smarten it up myself. I dont have experience of doing work like this and don't really know how much time and work would be involved. So I'm wondering if it would be better just sell it as it is. I've looked at various other sites to try to find out how much to sell it for, but cannot find anything in a similar situation to compare prices. Grateful for any advice on this. Get it in for an MOT. If it fails on minor things probably worth getting them fixed. But even if more the MOT results will help a remote buyer (Ebay etc) decide on what they're willing to pay. Don't do any more than just clean it up. Anyone wanting this sort of car will likely be happy to do the work themselves rather than pay for a patch up job. -- *Atheism is a non-prophet organization. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , ian wrote: Get it in for an MOT. If it fails on minor things probably worth getting them fixed. But even if more the MOT results will help a remote buyer (Ebay etc) decide on what they're willing to pay. Don't do any more than just clean it up. Anyone wanting this sort of car will likely be happy to do the work themselves rather than pay for a patch up job. I've restored many minis and agree with all the advice given with regard to getting an MOT and not doing work yourself. Most minis of this age will need welding and a clean example such as this is far easier to assess and work on. Pricewise, I would usually pay around £500 for an average condition one of this year, but I would expect to pay more for a good example such as this. A private buyer could well pay a hell of a lot more. |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:54:45 GMT, "Mrcheerful"
wrote: "ian" wrote in message ... An elderly relative has just given me a an Austin Mini 1000 City E, First Registered in April 1986 and with only Nineteen Thousand miles on it. This is genuine since it comes with old MOTs. Only one previous owner and she bought it from new. It has been in a dry garage for the last three years and has only done 887 miles since it passed its MOT in 2004. It currently starts and runs without any trouble. Since I'm a bit short of cash at the moment I would like to sell it straightaway, but am unsure whether to sell it as it is (some surface body work in places, see car front on website photo): http://i5.tinypic.com/6jakcph.jpg Or to try to smarten it up myself. I dont have experience of doing work like this and don't really know how much time and work would be involved. So I'm wondering if it would be better just sell it as it is. I've looked at various other sites to try to find out how much to sell it for, but cannot find anything in a similar situation to compare prices. Grateful for any advice on this. Thanks. put it in for an MoT, don't try to do any bodywork, put on ebay and say the status of the MoT whether it is a pass or a fail and list any known faults, describe it honestly and wait for the bids, I would guess at 500 to 1000, if the mot is a pass then 600 up Lucky to find any sort of MOT'd Mini for under a grand now. I paid £600 for a T&T'd 1978 1000 two years ago, and that had no headlining at the time. Even then I thought I'd done well. That car looks bloody good for its year. With an MOT it's worth about £1200 I'd say. Like others have said, don't try and do anything to it - the time and cost to do a proper job is more than you will get back. A bodge job will not enhance its value. On the other hand, advertising it on some ot the Mini forums like Minifinity and The Mini Forum will cost you nothing (other than a couple of minutes to register) and you'll be advertising to the right market. -- Regards, Chris (Please take out my car to reply by plain text email) ---1967 Riley Elf---1978 Mini 1000---1971 Mini Clubman--- ----1972 Mini Clubman estate----------1979 Ford Capri---- |
|
|||
|
"Meteor" wrote in message ... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , ian wrote: Get it in for an MOT. If it fails on minor things probably worth getting them fixed. But even if more the MOT results will help a remote buyer (Ebay etc) decide on what they're willing to pay. Don't do any more than just clean it up. Anyone wanting this sort of car will likely be happy to do the work themselves rather than pay for a patch up job. I've restored many minis and agree with all the advice given with regard to getting an MOT and not doing work yourself. Most minis of this age will need welding and a clean example such as this is far easier to assess and work on. Pricewise, I would usually pay around £500 for an average condition one of this year, but I would expect to pay more for a good example such as this. A private buyer could well pay a hell of a lot more. In my opinion, the early Mini's were the biggest load of crap ever to be put on the roads. My first Mini (1961) had single leading shoe front brakes which were hopeless in heavy braking The gearbox was rubbish, not helped by the two foot long gear lever and the handbrake cable route must have been designed to seize. The CV joint rubber covers and drive shaft couplings were located under the constant oil drips from the engine and so rotted away and failed. The suspension constantly squeaked until I had to replace all the plastic cups, and I could almost hear the car rusting in my dad's garage. The push button start on the floor was quite innovative at the time. My second MIni was a Clubman - a great improvement, but still subject to rusting. I did a magnificent job on a rusty door bottom - you literally couldn't tell the difference and I sold it at a very good price. I also had an Austin Maxi at the time, but that's another story! However, both my Mini's were great fun to drive and I have many, many happy memories. The new BMW Minis look nice, but I'm afraid I wouldn't be interested at an entry level of £11.625. My first Mini cost £360 new. I trust the new ones have power assisted front discs these days! Mine didn't even have a radio and just a recirculatory heater. Terry D. |
|
|||
|
"Terry D" wrote in message ... "Meteor" wrote in message ... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , ian wrote: Get it in for an MOT. If it fails on minor things probably worth getting them fixed. But even if more the MOT results will help a remote buyer (Ebay etc) decide on what they're willing to pay. Don't do any more than just clean it up. Anyone wanting this sort of car will likely be happy to do the work themselves rather than pay for a patch up job. I've restored many minis and agree with all the advice given with regard to getting an MOT and not doing work yourself. Most minis of this age will need welding and a clean example such as this is far easier to assess and work on. Pricewise, I would usually pay around £500 for an average condition one of this year, but I would expect to pay more for a good example such as this. A private buyer could well pay a hell of a lot more. In my opinion, the early Mini's were the biggest load of crap ever to be put on the roads. My first Mini (1961) had single leading shoe front brakes which were hopeless in heavy braking The gearbox was rubbish, not helped by the two foot long gear lever and the handbrake cable route must have been designed to seize. The CV joint rubber covers and drive shaft couplings were located under the constant oil drips from the engine and so rotted away and failed. The suspension constantly squeaked until I had to replace all the plastic cups, and I could almost hear the car rusting in my dad's garage. The push button start on the floor was quite innovative at the time. Some things were improved as time went on, but not many :-) My second MIni was a Clubman - a great improvement, but still subject to rusting. I did a magnificent job on a rusty door bottom - you literally couldn't tell the difference and I sold it at a very good price. I also had an Austin Maxi at the time, but that's another story! However, both my Mini's were great fun to drive and I have many, many happy memories. The new BMW Minis look nice, but I'm afraid I wouldn't be interested at an entry level of £11.625. My first Mini cost £360 new. I trust the new ones have power assisted front discs these days! Mine didn't even have a radio and just a recirculatory heater. The later ones had disc brakes, but usually NOT power assisted. Made life even more interesting. Plus the fact that pads and discs last for ages due to the inability to put enough pressure on them to wear! |
|
|||
|
Meteor wrote:
[...] The later ones had disc brakes, but usually NOT power assisted. Made life even more interesting. Later ones than the OP's had twin leading shoe front brakes. These were acceptable for the standards of the early Sixties. Early Coopers had non-servo discs with a hydraulic booster; they were hopeless! Plus the fact that pads and discs last for ages due to the inability to put enough pressure on them to wear! Funnily enough, I've owned cars from that era that had non-servo disc brakes. I always found pad wear to be horrendously high due to the fact that very soft friction material was needed in order to minimise pedal pressure. One of the vehicles was lucky to make it to 6,000 miles on a set of pads... Disc wear on more modern cars appears to be related to the introduction of friction material that doesn't contain asbestos. Chris -- Remove prejudice to reply. |
|
|||
|
"Terry D" wrote in message ... " My first Mini cost £360 new." ---------------------------------------------------------- Must have been a van then @£360. Iirc the launch price of the car was a shade under £500 in 1959. Mike.H. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|