A UK cars and automobiles  forum. Auto Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Auto Banter forum » UK Auto Newsgroups » uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic)

Tags: ,

Mystery Crankshaft ID?



 
 
Trackback Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 19th 07, 09:57 PM posted to uk.rec.cars.classic
dave sanderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Mystery Crankshaft ID?

On 5 Apr, 19:08, "R.N. Robinson"
wrote:
"dave sanderson" wrote in message

oups.com...



A few dimensions might help.


Overall length for a start, and some idea of the stroke, which you should
be
able to give us without unwrapping it too much.


Ron Robinson


Was just in the garage doing that...
All measurements with a ruler, so reasonably accurate, but not
precise.
Cranks is ~17" oa length. stroke is ~3.5", give or take a smidge.
Mains are ~1.75" dia, 1 3/32 wide. big ends are ~1.5"
The cylinders are on centers of: 1 and 2 ~2 9/16" 2 and 3 ~3 and 9/16
and 3 and 4 ~2 9/16" the extra inch is in the center main, not thicker
webs.
The center web has no extra past the main bearing,neither do the mains
at the ends. Ive not seen a crank like that before, usually there is
some balancing web. In Vizards TBASE the photo of the A30 crank (pg
359 in the second edition) looks similar, but the webs between 1 and 2
and 3 and 4 are to thick, and there are balancing weights, whih are
not present on the mystery item. This itself suggests to me it is a
crank for an earlier engine?

The stroke is about right for a late 1940's A40 (Devon, Dorset) but I would
expect those to have had counterweights. The lack of them would indicate
something earlier and Austin before the war did the whole range from 8hp up.
I don't know the bores and strokes of these, but I'm guessing Austin 8 or
10hp. The 12hp was 69mm bore x 100mm stroke or thereabouts so it would have
to be smaller than that.

Ron Robinson


Been mulling this over, so tonight I had another look at the tag on
the crankshaft. I think that the number I though was a five might
actually be an eight, especially after comparing with some of my late
grandfathers writing. New question now, does anyone have a pictute of
an Austin Eight crankshaft? older cars used to have parts booklets,
with line drawings showing all the bits, even this would help. Or
specs of the engine, the usually helpful internet seems not to have
much on these earlier austins (what did we do before all the
information was available instantly?)

thanks all

Dave

Dave

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC3
Copyright ©2004-2008 Auto Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Credit Cards - Myspace Layouts - Loans - Cheap Car Insurance