![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: crankshaft, mystery |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On 5 Apr, 19:08, "R.N. Robinson"
wrote: "dave sanderson" wrote in message oups.com... A few dimensions might help. Overall length for a start, and some idea of the stroke, which you should be able to give us without unwrapping it too much. Ron Robinson Was just in the garage doing that... All measurements with a ruler, so reasonably accurate, but not precise. Cranks is ~17" oa length. stroke is ~3.5", give or take a smidge. Mains are ~1.75" dia, 1 3/32 wide. big ends are ~1.5" The cylinders are on centers of: 1 and 2 ~2 9/16" 2 and 3 ~3 and 9/16 and 3 and 4 ~2 9/16" the extra inch is in the center main, not thicker webs. The center web has no extra past the main bearing,neither do the mains at the ends. Ive not seen a crank like that before, usually there is some balancing web. In Vizards TBASE the photo of the A30 crank (pg 359 in the second edition) looks similar, but the webs between 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 are to thick, and there are balancing weights, whih are not present on the mystery item. This itself suggests to me it is a crank for an earlier engine? The stroke is about right for a late 1940's A40 (Devon, Dorset) but I would expect those to have had counterweights. The lack of them would indicate something earlier and Austin before the war did the whole range from 8hp up. I don't know the bores and strokes of these, but I'm guessing Austin 8 or 10hp. The 12hp was 69mm bore x 100mm stroke or thereabouts so it would have to be smaller than that. Ron Robinson Been mulling this over, so tonight I had another look at the tag on the crankshaft. I think that the number I though was a five might actually be an eight, especially after comparing with some of my late grandfathers writing. New question now, does anyone have a pictute of an Austin Eight crankshaft? older cars used to have parts booklets, with line drawings showing all the bits, even this would help. Or specs of the engine, the usually helpful internet seems not to have much on these earlier austins (what did we do before all the information was available instantly?) thanks all Dave Dave |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|