![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: carbs, cd1752, stomberg |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Alex" wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:48:38 +0000 (UTC), "Badger" wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Badger wrote: I never saw a picture of them, or a post with a link, so I was simply guessing. BTW, SD1's used them right up until 1981, Rangerovers used them until the intro of EFI in the early 80's, so not just very early rover v8's. Non EFI versions of this engine were made till about '90, and all with Strombergs. Usually found in things like ambulances. A lot of the later carb versions went over to SU's though, not seen many strombergs after early 80's Dave, at least not on a landrover product. 90's and 110's went over to SU's, as did some of the last of the non-efi rangies and sd1's, the sd1's having the unreliable choke stepper-motors a-la maestro! Not convinced about sherpa's/ldv's, worked on an ambulance that had su's but never seen one with strombergs - not seen that many either way, could be the 2 I've actually seen the underbonnet of had been converrted to su's? The Strombergs were usually fitted to the detuned spec engines, if required for overseas work, MOD, special body builders etc etc. The MOD spec'd twin strombergs on the v8's, along with restrictor plates in the carbs, thus reducing the power output of the v8 to something dreadfull. That is only true for the early MOD spec 110 V8's, and some very early 130's. When the name changed from 110 to defender, the restrictors were binned and SU's were fitted to all uk (inc. MOD spec) defender 110's. The same time as the quoted power output increased to 134bhp. Trust me, I've worked on a LOT of MOD V8 landrovers over the years ;-) Badger. |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:36:49 +0000 (UTC), "Badger"
wrote: "Alex" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:48:38 +0000 (UTC), "Badger" wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Badger wrote: I never saw a picture of them, or a post with a link, so I was simply guessing. BTW, SD1's used them right up until 1981, Rangerovers used them until the intro of EFI in the early 80's, so not just very early rover v8's. Non EFI versions of this engine were made till about '90, and all with Strombergs. Usually found in things like ambulances. A lot of the later carb versions went over to SU's though, not seen many strombergs after early 80's Dave, at least not on a landrover product. 90's and 110's went over to SU's, as did some of the last of the non-efi rangies and sd1's, the sd1's having the unreliable choke stepper-motors a-la maestro! Not convinced about sherpa's/ldv's, worked on an ambulance that had su's but never seen one with strombergs - not seen that many either way, could be the 2 I've actually seen the underbonnet of had been converrted to su's? The Strombergs were usually fitted to the detuned spec engines, if required for overseas work, MOD, special body builders etc etc. The MOD spec'd twin strombergs on the v8's, along with restrictor plates in the carbs, thus reducing the power output of the v8 to something dreadfull. That is only true for the early MOD spec 110 V8's, and some very early 130's. When the name changed from 110 to defender, the restrictors were binned and SU's were fitted to all uk (inc. MOD spec) defender 110's. The same time as the quoted power output increased to 134bhp. Trust me, I've worked on a LOT of MOD V8 landrovers over the years ;-) Badger. I was referring in particular to the 101 v8 which was in production from 1973 to 1978, which used exculsivly Strombergs on the 3.5 v8. Alex |
|
|||
|
"Alex" wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:36:49 +0000 (UTC), "Badger" wrote: The Strombergs were usually fitted to the detuned spec engines, if required for overseas work, MOD, special body builders etc etc. The MOD spec'd twin strombergs on the v8's, along with restrictor plates in the carbs, thus reducing the power output of the v8 to something dreadfull. That is only true for the early MOD spec 110 V8's, and some very early 130's. When the name changed from 110 to defender, the restrictors were binned and SU's were fitted to all uk (inc. MOD spec) defender 110's. The same time as the quoted power output increased to 134bhp. Trust me, I've worked on a LOT of MOD V8 landrovers over the years ;-) Badger. I was referring in particular to the 101 v8 which was in production from 1973 to 1978, which used exculsivly Strombergs on the 3.5 v8. Right. But that's not what I thought you meant, it sounded as if you were saying that the MOD spec'd Strombergs on all their v8 landrovers. FWIW, not many 101's had restrictors, in fact most were removed in service, if they were ever fitted at all. The restrictors were originally fitted by landrover to the 109 Stage 1 V8 as standard, as landrover felt the handling and braking with a trailer especially weren't up to the power of the engine. Badger. |
|
|||
|
"Willy Eckerslyke" wrote in message ... I was given a nice assortment of Triumph Vitesse bits recently. In the box of carbs were a pair of CD175-2 Strombergs (usual Vitesse ones are CD150s). I'll stick them on Ebay, but it would help to know what they're off. Any ideas? They have red labels on saying "emission control systems". Does that imply US spec? http://www.sos.bangor.ac.uk/~oss108/cd175s.jpg As usual, any info gratefully received. Most defenitly Triumph TR250 & TR6 US-specs. The showed linkage proves the origin, there is one just like it sitting in my garage. :-) Erik |
|
|||
|
That is only true for the early MOD spec 110 V8's, and some very early 130's. When the name changed from 110 to defender, the restrictors were binned and SU's were fitted to all uk (inc. MOD spec) defender 110's. The same time as the quoted power output increased to 134bhp. Trust me, I've worked on a LOT of MOD V8 landrovers over the years ;-) Badger. I was referring in particular to the 101 v8 which was in production from 1973 to 1978, which used exculsivly Strombergs on the 3.5 v8. Right. But that's not what I thought you meant, it sounded as if you were saying that the MOD spec'd Strombergs on all their v8 landrovers. FWIW, not many 101's had restrictors, in fact most were removed in service, if they were ever fitted at all. The restrictors were originally fitted by landrover to the 109 Stage 1 V8 as standard, as landrover felt the handling and braking with a trailer especially weren't up to the power of the engine. Badger. Beg pardon, you're right that they didn't continue to spec the strombergs. Certainly the 101's had the restrictors removed, most while they were in service as the power output of the v8 was woeful with them fitted. It wasn't a great deal better without them. Alex |
|
|||
|
"Alex" wrote in message ... That is only true for the early MOD spec 110 V8's, and some very early 130's. When the name changed from 110 to defender, the restrictors were binned and SU's were fitted to all uk (inc. MOD spec) defender 110's. The same time as the quoted power output increased to 134bhp. Trust me, I've worked on a LOT of MOD V8 landrovers over the years ;-) Badger. I was referring in particular to the 101 v8 which was in production from 1973 to 1978, which used exculsivly Strombergs on the 3.5 v8. Right. But that's not what I thought you meant, it sounded as if you were saying that the MOD spec'd Strombergs on all their v8 landrovers. FWIW, not many 101's had restrictors, in fact most were removed in service, if they were ever fitted at all. The restrictors were originally fitted by landrover to the 109 Stage 1 V8 as standard, as landrover felt the handling and braking with a trailer especially weren't up to the power of the engine. Badger. Beg pardon, you're right that they didn't continue to spec the strombergs. Certainly the 101's had the restrictors removed, most while they were in service as the power output of the v8 was woeful with them fitted. It wasn't a great deal better without them. True, probably something to do with the woefully inadequate 8.13 compression ratio! Badger. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|