![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: 1885, earlpart, ebay, front, ltd, mk2, original, selling, set, wings, wolseley |
|
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi From Earlpart Ltd We are selling a set of Wolseley 18/85 Mk2
Original front wings R-H & L-H on ebay. In Christine condition. Never been used. Very rare probably the only 2 Originals left in the UK or the world. Made by British Leyland Part No. CZA1530 R-H CZA1530 L-H if you are interested please see http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=4565142772 We are a well-known Ltd company based in Derbyshire. See www.earlpart.com we accept all types of credit card payments Over the phone or fax in office hours 8 to 5 Monday to Friday. We also will accept cheques or postal orders made payable to Earlpart Ltd all payments must be made in uk pounds Sterling Thank you Adrian Eyre Earlpart Ltd |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
What on earth is "Christine" condition? Does it mean they've been used in a
Stephen King film? Mike. wrote in message ups.com... Hi From Earlpart Ltd We are selling a set of Wolseley 18/85 Mk2 Original front wings R-H & L-H on ebay. In Christine condition. Never been used. Very rare probably the only 2 Originals left in the UK or the world. Made by British Leyland Part No. CZA1530 R-H CZA1530 L-H if you are interested please see http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=4565142772 We are a well-known Ltd company based in Derbyshire. See www.earlpart.com we accept all types of credit card payments Over the phone or fax in office hours 8 to 5 Monday to Friday. We also will accept cheques or postal orders made payable to Earlpart Ltd all payments must be made in uk pounds Sterling Thank you Adrian Eyre Earlpart Ltd |
|
|||
|
In article , Mike
wrote: What on earth is "Christine" condition? Does it mean they've been used in a Stephen King film? What on earth are you referring to? You have posted upside down and not provided any context before your comment. See if this helps: http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post -- AJL |
|
|||
|
I was referring to the line in the op where the wings were referred to as
being in "Christine" condition, of course. I assumed that anyone who might read my post had first read the original post. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I accept that you may prefer to post at the bottom, I personally find it inconvenient to have to scroll to read responses. Mike "Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics)" wrote in message . .. In article , Mike wrote: What on earth is "Christine" condition? Does it mean they've been used in a Stephen King film? What on earth are you referring to? You have posted upside down and not provided any context before your comment. See if this helps: http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post -- AJL |
|
|||
|
In article , Mike
wrote: I accept that you may prefer to post at the bottom, I personally find it inconvenient to have to scroll to read responses. I find it inconvenient to bother with those who post upside down. It is rare that they have anything worthwhile to contribute. *plonk* -- AJL |
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... I accept that you may prefer to post at the bottom, I personally find it inconvenient to have to scroll to read responses. Then you miss out on contributing to a conversation at the correct place, and end up providing an answer well before the question may have been asked which makes you look like a smart arse, or asking a question after the snawer has already been given, which makes you look stupid. -- Carl Robson Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com |
|
|||
|
I accept that you may prefer to post at the bottom, I personally find it
inconvenient to have to scroll to read responses. Then you miss out on contributing to a conversation at the correct place, and end up providing an answer well before the question may have been asked which makes you look like a smart arse, or asking a question after the snawer has already been given, which makes you look stupid. Happy now? I can see your point, and that of the other poster, and I think if I was adding multiple comments inside a thread I might post differently. In fact I think about it so little I couldn't honestly say I never do one thing, or always do another, when posting. Having contributed to forums for many years now I can say that you are the first two people who have taken the time to comment. It's obviously less important, to everyone else at least, than you might think. BTW, what's a "snawer"? (meant in jest, not in flame). Mike. -- Carl Robson Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com |
|
|||
|
Mike wrote:
re top-posting Happy now? I can see your point, and that of the other poster, and I think if I was adding multiple comments inside a thread I might post differently. In fact I think about it so little I couldn't honestly say I never do one thing, or always do another, when posting. Having contributed to forums for many years now I can say that you are the first two people who have taken the time to comment. I find that very hard to believe. But then personally I've given up trying to persuade people to post properly, I just ignore them instead or killfile them if they're especially prolific. It's obviously less important, to everyone else at least, than you might think. "Everyone else" being who exactly? How do you know how many people have ever ignored your posts simply because they CBA to read them upside down? |
|
|||
|
why is it all you guys argue over the littlest of things. So Mike got
it wrong so what? I take it Mike is human like us all and like us all occasionally gets things wrong. It is all most like we are meant to be born with the knowledge to post in a newsgroup. We all live and learn. Even though Mike was criticising my choice of words Thank You Adrian Eyre |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:39:19 +0100, Sleeker GT Phwoar
stopped wearing his colon as a hat and wrote: In article , says... I accept that you may prefer to post at the bottom, I personally find it inconvenient to have to scroll to read responses. Then you miss out on contributing to a conversation at the correct place, and end up providing an answer well before the question may have been asked which makes you look like a smart arse, or asking a question after the snawer has already been given, which makes you look stupid. Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to be is like ****ting in your pants because that's where your asshole happened to be. -- Andreas Prilop (c.i.w.a.h) |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|