![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.classic (Classic Cars) (uk.rec.cars.classic) |
| Tags: classics, magazine, practical |
|
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I agree - I've been a regular buyer for 20 years, but stopped about 6 months
ago as there was nothing left in it I wanted to read. --- This mail message was virus scanned. No virus was found but no guarantees are offered! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 04/07/2003 |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
I think maybe they have been trying to get a readership together for RPM mag
before they launch it or at least test the viability of it. Personally I like the idea of performance from your old motor but I can also respect the purists and their dedication. At the end of the day the magazine has to evolve a little or it will die - I do tend to agree that there is rather a lot of "slap a Z tech in your model T and it'll fly" type stories. If I wanted a Z tech I'd buy a Focus. -- J Plymouth to Dakar in two Triumph Heralds, yes really! Visit http://www.team-michelotti.org and see how you can help. "Tim" wrote in message ... I agree - I've been a regular buyer for 20 years, but stopped about 6 months ago as there was nothing left in it I wanted to read. --- This mail message was virus scanned. No virus was found but no guarantees are offered! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 04/07/2003 |
|
|||
|
I think maybe they have been trying to get a readership together for RPM mag before they launch it or at least test the viability of it. Personally I like the idea of performance from your old motor but I can also respect the purists and their dedication. At the end of the day the magazine has to evolve a little or it will die - I do tend to agree that there is rather a lot of "slap a Z tech in your model T and it'll fly" type stories. If I wanted a Z tech I'd buy a Focus. Holman says he's been listening to what people as he extensively travels etc. etc. and came up with RPM. Kak! If he was honest he would say, "Someone else is going to publish a mag about modified classics and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon." Yup, there's two "Retro Cars" as bought by JC, and "RPM" so hopefully classic car mags should be clear of such things. If there's a market for them then good luck to them. Pete W |
|
|||
|
"Pete W." wrote in message ... I think maybe they have been trying to get a readership together for RPM mag before they launch it or at least test the viability of it. Personally I like the idea of performance from your old motor but I can also respect the purists and their dedication. At the end of the day the magazine has to evolve a little or it will die - I do tend to agree that there is rather a lot of "slap a Z tech in your model T and it'll fly" type stories. If I wanted a Z tech I'd buy a Focus. Holman says he's been listening to what people as he extensively travels etc. etc. and came up with RPM. Kak! If he was honest he would say, "Someone else is going to publish a mag about modified classics and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon." So busy jumping on to bandwagons that he can't be bothered to check his facts, even when they are staring him in the face. Ron Robinson |
|
|||
|
"Pete W." wrote in message ... I think maybe they have been trying to get a readership together for RPM mag before they launch it or at least test the viability of it. Personally I like the idea of performance from your old motor but I can also respect the purists and their dedication. At the end of the day the magazine has to evolve a little or it will die - I do tend to agree that there is rather a lot of "slap a Z tech in your model T and it'll fly" type stories. If I wanted a Z tech I'd buy a Focus. Holman says he's been listening to what people as he extensively travels etc. etc. and came up with RPM. Kak! If he was honest he would say, "Someone else is going to publish a mag about modified classics and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon." Yup, there's two "Retro Cars" as bought by JC, and "RPM" so hopefully classic car mags should be clear of such things. If there's a market for them then good luck to them. Pete W When the economy is doing OK and house prices are on the up there seems to me to be no limit to mens ability to buy specialist car magazines. New magazines abound every week . God knows how the landrover market alone stands 4 magazines . When the economy gets back to usual the more esoteric will dissappear overnight. Steve the grease |
|
|||
|
I'm new to this scene having recently bought a Mk I Golf GTI. I bought
Practical Classics magazine (the one with the Jag E-type and the Mini on the front). I must say, I thought it was excellent. The people who do it seem very friendly and genuine enthusiasts. Maybe I'm just niave! "R. N. Robinson" wrote in message ... "Pete W." wrote in message ... I think maybe they have been trying to get a readership together for RPM mag before they launch it or at least test the viability of it. Personally I like the idea of performance from your old motor but I can also respect the purists and their dedication. At the end of the day the magazine has to evolve a little or it will die - I do tend to agree that there is rather a lot of "slap a Z tech in your model T and it'll fly" type stories. If I wanted a Z tech I'd buy a Focus. Holman says he's been listening to what people as he extensively travels etc. etc. and came up with RPM. Kak! If he was honest he would say, "Someone else is going to publish a mag about modified classics and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon." So busy jumping on to bandwagons that he can't be bothered to check his facts, even when they are staring him in the face. Ron Robinson |
|
|||
|
Jimmy Page wrote:
I'm new to this scene having recently bought a Mk I Golf GTI. I bought Practical Classics magazine (the one with the Jag E-type and the Mini on the front). I must say, I thought it was excellent. The people who do it seem very friendly and genuine enthusiasts. Maybe I'm just niave! I've defended them on occasion in the past. If you asked everyone which articles they disliked the most, you'd probably get completely different answers from everyone, suggesting that they haven't actually hit a bad balance. Obviously when you've been reading the mag for a few years, you see the same stuff coming around now and again, but on the whole, I'm still happy enough to subscribe. I tend to see their technical articles merely as pointers and then delve deeper on the net or here if I need to know more. And yes, I've found them pretty friendly when I've met any of them at shows or contacted them. |
|
|||
|
"William Davies" wrote in message ... Jimmy Page wrote in message om... I read all my Practical Classics mag and wanted more so i bought another one called "Classics." It seems to be along similar lines but not as well done. Is it a copy of Practical Classics or the other way round? Practical Classics is the original and has been going since sometime around 1980. Yes, May 1980, Issue No. 1 had a picture of a AH 3000 and a Frog eyed Sprite IIRC. [1] It has it's ups and downs, I've not bought it reguarly since the early 1990s when there was a particular upheaval which changed the format, The biggest change was when it moved to Petebour', it became a classic version on 'Car Mechanic' or 'Practical Motorist' type mag - IIRC it even had some of the old 'CM' articles and or writer. (subsequently changed many times) though I've continued to buy it on occasion. It has recently featured a strong bias towards highly modified cars - not something which interests me to any great degree so it's stayed on the shelves recently, Yes, it seems to have more in common with 'Custom Car' than 'Classic Cars' [2] at times from what I've seen [3] ! :~( [1] who remembers who started Practical Classics ? [2] who remembers the (old) full title of that magazine ? [3] hopefully the new retro performance car mag they are starting will allow PC to return to / restoring / classic cars and dealing with keeping them as built. |
|
|||
|
"Jerry." wrote in message
... "William Davies" wrote in message ... Jimmy Page wrote in message om... I read all my Practical Classics mag and wanted more so i bought another one called "Classics." It seems to be along similar lines but not as well done. Is it a copy of Practical Classics or the other way round? Practical Classics is the original and has been going since sometime around 1980. Yes, May 1980, Issue No. 1 had a picture of a AH 3000 and a Frog eyed Sprite IIRC. [1] It has it's ups and downs, I've not bought it reguarly since the early 1990s when there was a particular upheaval which changed the format, The biggest change was when it moved to Petebour', it became a classic version on 'Car Mechanic' or 'Practical Motorist' type mag - IIRC it even had some of the old 'CM' articles and or writer. (subsequently changed many times) though I've continued to buy it on occasion. It has recently featured a strong bias towards highly modified cars - not something which interests me to any great degree so it's stayed on the shelves recently, Yes, it seems to have more in common with 'Custom Car' than 'Classic Cars' [2] at times from what I've seen [3] ! :~( [1] who remembers who started Practical Classics ? Paul Skilleter, Peter Hart and Gordon Wright. Sold PC to Emap which is why format, content etc changed in early 90's. [2] who remembers the (old) full title of that magazine ? Can't remember but maybe Practical Classics and Car Restorer? [3] hopefully the new retro performance car mag they are starting will allow PC to return to / restoring / classic cars and dealing with keeping them as built. Mark www.Classic-Car-News.co.uk Buying or selling a Jaguar, go to www.Jaguars4sale.com |
|
|||
|
The message
from "William Davies" contains these words: I read all my Practical Classics mag and wanted more so i bought another one called "Classics." It seems to be along similar lines but not as well done. Is it a copy of Practical Classics or the other way round? Practical Classics is the original and has been going since sometime around 1980. It has it's ups and downs, I've not bought it reguarly since the early 1990s when there was a particular upheaval which changed the format, (subsequently changed many times) though I've continued to buy it on occasion. It has recently featured a strong bias towards highly modified cars - not something which interests me to any great degree so it's stayed on the shelves recently, AFAICR Classic Cars was the first mainstream magazine to concentrate on on classic cars. IIRC that started in October 1973. -- Roger Top Posters killfiled on sight |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|