![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.4x4 (4 Wheel Drive Vehicles) (uk.rec.cars.4x4) |
| Tags: crv, xtrail |
|
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money
towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )TIA for any help. Bob |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
curious wrote:
Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )X-Trail. All-round better vehicle, more room, better economy, better towing capacity, just a better car. IMHO ![]() -- Dogpoop On walkabout. |
|
|||
|
Dogpoop wrote: curious wrote: Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )X-Trail. All-round better vehicle, more room, better economy, better towing capacity, just a better car. IMHO ![]() Agree but no doubt someone else won't !! |
|
|||
|
curious wrote:
Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )TIA for any help. Bob If you don't actually need the 4x4 have a look at the Fiat Doblo. My wife has one and, compared to my Grand Vitara, it has better access, more elbow roon and a higher driving posuition! Oh. and it's a lot cheaper! |
|
|||
|
"curious" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )TIA for any help. I can't comment on the X-Trail but we've had a CR-V for nearly 2 years and are delighted with it. The only thing I'd change would be to have an "up opening" rear door, even then that is to fit in with a specialest use I have for the boot area. -- 73 Brian, G8OSN www.g8osn.org.uk |
|
|||
|
Brian Reay wrote: "curious" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm thinking of using my motorbility money towards a "softroader". I don't need a full blown 4WD but I do need the ease of access they offer with the high driving position. I@ve narrowed it down to either an X-Trail or a CR-V, both having advantages and disadvantages for me. Any views on which to choose? (The Freelander is out on cost grounds )TIA for any help. I can't comment on the X-Trail but we've had a CR-V for nearly 2 years and are delighted with it. The only thing I'd change would be to have an "up opening" rear door, even then that is to fit in with a specialest use I have for the boot area. which the X-Trail does have............. |
|
|||
|
"chrisu" wrote in message I can't comment on the X-Trail but we've had a CR-V for nearly 2 years and are delighted with it. The only thing I'd change would be to have an "up opening" rear door, even then that is to fit in with a specialest use I have for the boot area. which the X-Trail does have............. Maybe the Nissan these days is built to the same standards as its "parent" company renault.? I had a 10 year old2 litre auto Primera (no probs in 110k miles) and was seriously looking at the Quashqai(?) and heard of a lot of probs with the turbo in the diesel and even the 2 litre petrol with its chain driven engine giving issues. maybe not too much of an issue IF you are only keeping it for 3 years? but as it was another 10 year purchase forme its goodbye nissan |
|
|||
|
Hi. Thanks for the input on my CR-V v X-Trail
choice. You've certainly given me room for thought. I've checked the Nissan reliability and apparently over 40% of JD Power Survey respondents have had problems with it. On the other hand the same survey rates the Peugeot 407 as worst in it's class for reliability and I've had mine for 2.5 years and not had any problems! The CR-V gets a good rating, second only to the Lexus, But a lot of people are saying the ride is too hard on ordinary (Non-motorway & A) roads, which is where I do most of my driving. I think it's time for a test drive in both cars. We did look at the Fiat Doblo but my wife didn't like it's looks. Thanks again Bob |
|
|||
|
"curious" wrote in message ... Hi. Thanks for the input on my CR-V v X-Trail choice. You've certainly given me room for thought. I've checked the Nissan reliability and apparently over 40% of JD Power Survey respondents have had problems with it. On the other hand the same survey rates the Peugeot 407 as worst in it's class for reliability and I've had mine for 2.5 years and not had any problems! The CR-V gets a good rating, second only to the Lexus, But a lot of people are saying the ride is too hard on ordinary (Non-motorway & A) roads, which is where I do most of my driving. I think it's time for a test drive in both cars. We did look at the Fiat Doblo but my wife didn't like it's looks. I have a 53 plate X-trail (the facelift one) and recently drove the new one (170 dci sport expedition). Comparing the two I would say: a) its ALOT bigger that could be a plus or minus, for me, a minus. b) visibility over the bonnet is worse c) the interior is now massively better quality d) the boot is bigger and a better shape, but the sill is alittle lower. e) the rear leg room is worse, if anything. f) the 170 engine is brisk enough but not as quiet as it should be, but does spin happily to the redline, and indeed its best work is done over 3000rpm. g) being bigger and taller, it is alot more wallowly then the old one- it would ride no worse and be more pert if the springs were stiffer -similarly wallowey to the CRV which i felt i would tip over!! h) the general build quality is alot better and the doors less tinny. i) somne of the minor controls are still stupidly placed and out of sight. j) some of the major controls (window switches, column switches) are still NOT lit up at night. k) £4 grand more than the old one? I dont think so!! For £22k (for a decent spec) your into BMW X5 teritory and I know which I would buy!! Tim.. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|