![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.rec.cars.4x4 (4 Wheel Drive Vehicles) (uk.rec.cars.4x4) |
| Tags: etc, nissan, xtrail |
|
|
Trackback | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
-- "PR" wrote in message ... Some people dont like the "plastic wood" on the higher models, and there are other bits that are down to personal taste, but having driven some very much more expensive machinery I cant personally agree with your impressions - but in this case its your money and you will buy something else! Most people who have X-Trails seem to like them and have no real problems with them - for me personally, the X-trail just isnt in the league I am looking for - I had 2 choices, The Sorento or something 10 to 15k more expensive like the new Volvo or VW offerings. I saved the money, bought a Sorento 3.5v6 and dont feel that I am in a fundamentally inferior or "cheaper" car. However good the X-Trail is it is hard to see it as a genuine alternative to something at the 30k plus mark, The Sorento is far, far, closer to it (as long as you dont need the Volvos 7 seats!). I have just been looking at both the Sorrento and the X-Trail this week at the Display in the Shopping Centre at Milton Keynes. Within the next 3 months I want to purchase a replacement tow car and both cars mentioned would fit the bill and are of a very similar price. I have to say that I liked the Sorrento it seemed well designed and put together. My concern is with the Kia, despite the avalanche of praise it has received is what happens in the longer term with reliability and values. I suppose you could say that buying anything with four wheels on new is a mugs game!!! Out of the two I think my choice would be the X-Trail particularly as it now comes with an uprated engine of 136hp. It is a smaller vehicle than the Sorrento which would suit my wife. I now have to decide whether the X-Trail is going to make a better towcar than a Ford Mondeo 130hp diesel as I can acquire a new one of the latter at an advantageous price. David - Milton Keynes www.caravantravels.co.uk Details of our Caravan Travels in the UK and Europe with help and advice and site reports |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
Nissan build cars!
Honda make motorbikes! I have a Nissan X-Trail and a Yamaha 900 motorbike. I would not touch the Hondas. I traded a Discovery for the X-Tail and in preference to a Freelander. GO for it you will not be disappointed on price, economy or performance and fun. |
|
|||
|
slightly behind the times ?
Do BMW only build bubble cars still? wrote in message ... Nissan build cars! Honda make motorbikes! I have a Nissan X-Trail and a Yamaha 900 motorbike. I would not touch the Hondas. I traded a Discovery for the X-Tail and in preference to a Freelander. GO for it you will not be disappointed on price, economy or performance and fun. |
|
|||
|
I have just been looking at both the Sorrento and the X-Trail this week at
the Display in the Shopping Centre at Milton Keynes. Within the next 3 months I want to purchase a replacement tow car and both cars mentioned would fit the bill and are of a very similar price. I have to say that I liked the Sorrento it seemed well designed and put together. My concern is with the Kia, despite the avalanche of praise it has received is what happens in the longer term with reliability and values. I suppose you could say that buying anything with four wheels on new is a mugs game!!! Out of the two I think my choice would be the X-Trail particularly as it now comes with an uprated engine of 136hp. It is a smaller vehicle than the Sorrento which would suit my wife. I now have to decide whether the X-Trail is going to make a better towcar than a Ford Mondeo 130hp diesel as I can acquire a new one of the latter at an advantageous price. David - Milton Keynes www.caravantravels.co.uk Details of our Caravan Travels in the UK and Europe with help and advice and site reports Do a comparison of the 2 cars on the What Car website and much of the data shows in some ways a strange similarity: e.g. Power (138 and 134 bhp) and torque (232 and 232 lb/ft) are virtually identical - so both cars will tow well. Surprisingly the X-Trail is only 57 mm shorter than the Sorento, though lower. Then look at the top speed, mpg and acceleration figures and the X-Trail wins hands down. I too sold a Discovery to buy an X-Trail and I am exceptionally pleased with it. If you like driving (with and without the caravan) then the X-Trail is much more car-like, is nippy and handles really well. If you want a higher driving position, cumbersome handling and performance which is more agricultural, then the Kia or Discovery fits the bill. Bob --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 04/08/2003 |
|
|||
|
Has anybody in this newsgroup had experience of these vehicles and any
problems? What I'm interested in is niggling faults, garage problems, anything that has caused discomfort for the owner. Certainly Paul, I've owned an X-Trail 2.0 Sport since September and I'm still ecstatically happy with it. I've had no problems with it at all (although I guess there's still time :-) Handles like a dream, well equipped, comfortable and roomy. If I had any quibbles, I would probably say that the gearbox needs to be worked a bit and the interior looks like it could scuff up easily. Also, one of my taller mates finds the headroom not quite good enough! But, I've no regrets and would definitely buy another. Depends what your budget is really; I'd say it's good value. I'd be very interested in hearing what you end up buying! Cheers, Chris |
|
|||
|
"Bob Edwards" wrote in message ... I have just been looking at both the Sorrento and the X-Trail this week at the Display in the Shopping Centre at Milton Keynes. Within the next 3 months I want to purchase a replacement tow car and both cars mentioned would fit the bill and are of a very similar price. I have to say that I liked the Sorrento it seemed well designed and put together. My concern is with the Kia, despite the avalanche of praise it has received is what happens in the longer term with reliability and values. I suppose you could say that buying anything with four wheels on new is a mugs game!!! Out of the two I think my choice would be the X-Trail particularly as it now comes with an uprated engine of 136hp. It is a smaller vehicle than the Sorrento which would suit my wife. I now have to decide whether the X-Trail is going to make a better towcar than a Ford Mondeo 130hp diesel as I can acquire a new one of the latter at an advantageous price. David - Milton Keynes www.caravantravels.co.uk Details of our Caravan Travels in the UK and Europe with help and advice and site reports Do a comparison of the 2 cars on the What Car website and much of the data shows in some ways a strange similarity: e.g. Power (138 and 134 bhp) and torque (232 and 232 lb/ft) are virtually identical - so both cars will tow well. True, although the Sorento achieves both max bhp and max torque at lower revs. The Sorento is rated to tow 2800kg against the Nissans 2000kg and its separate chassis, self levelling suspension and low range will all help Surprisingly the X-Trail is only 57 mm shorter than the Sorento, though lower. True it is only 57mm longer, but the 119mm extra width and 149mm extra height make a real difference, more passenger space and boot space massively up based on the figures on What Car (several times the volume). Then look at the top speed, mpg and acceleration figures and the X-Trail wins hands down. Thats pushing it a bit - the Sorento is approx 33% heavier than the Nissan and you would expect something that much bigger and heavier to use a but more fuel and be a bit slower (if similar engine). The Xtrail returns about 10% or so to the gallon and achieves 112 against the Sorentos 106 - neither of which can really be described as "winning hands down" in fact given the Sorentos 33% extra size and weight I would consider that advantage pretty poor. Acceleration 0-60 is a bit more of an issue with a 3 second difference, but "real world" performance is not an issue. I too sold a Discovery to buy an X-Trail and I am exceptionally pleased with it. If you like driving (with and without the caravan) then the X-Trail is much more car-like, is nippy and handles really well. If you want a higher driving position, cumbersome handling and performance which is more agricultural, then the Kia or Discovery fits the bill. Higher driving position, yes - to call the Kia "agricultural" in any sence is plain stupid (and, yes, I know What Car used that word). The discovery is agricultural, the kia is nothing like it at all. Handling is far from the likes of older "agricultural" 4x4's and it was tuned by Porche, yes - on bad roads the ride is a little harsh but it is very well controlled. The ride is not the Sorentos best point but on most roads it is just fine. Handling is well up to the near 200bhp of my 3.5, and it needs to be vivet the 0-60 of just under 10secs on a vehicle weighing 2 tonnes - I can throw it around with confidence no problems. Bob --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 04/08/2003 |
|
|||
|
"PR" wrote Higher driving position, yes - to call the Kia "agricultural" in any sence is plain stupid (and, yes, I know What Car used that word). The discovery is agricultural, the kia is nothing like it at all. Handling is far from the likes of older "agricultural" 4x4's and it was tuned by Porche, yes - Unfortunately neither are anywhere near 'agricultural' They do not have over 700Nm torque, 200g/kW/h fuel consumption, air suspended cab, air suspended seat with fore/aft and lateral suspension, hydraulic/electronic self levelling axle suspension, radar, CVT with multiple modes, electronic engine management which interacts with transmission so that at a set engine speed the accelerator pedal can be converted to a forward speed control; 70dbA noise level, 500 hour [approximately 20,000 mile] service intervals, 600/65R42 tyres and a big amber beacon. Wouldn't you prefer one of these to a 'not agricultural' heap? LOL. Huw --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 26/12/03 |
|
|||
|
Do a comparison of the 2 cars on the What Car website and much of the
data shows in some ways a strange similarity: e.g. Power (138 and 134 bhp) and torque (232 and 232 lb/ft) are virtually identical - so both cars will tow well. True, although the Sorento achieves both max bhp and max torque at lower revs. Minor difference. The Sorento is rated to tow 2800kg against the Nissans 2000kg and its separate chassis, self levelling suspension and low range will all help Help what - increase the weight? Surprisingly the X-Trail is only 57 mm shorter than the Sorento, though lower. True it is only 57mm longer, but the 119mm extra width and 149mm extra height make a real difference, more passenger space and boot space massively up based on the figures on What Car (several times the volume). Agree Then look at the top speed, mpg and acceleration figures and the X-Trail wins hands down. Thats pushing it a bit - the Sorento is approx 33% heavier than the Nissan and you would expect something that much bigger and heavier to use a but more fuel and be a bit slower (if similar engine). The Xtrail returns about 10% or so to the gallon and achieves 112 against the Sorentos 106 - neither of which can really be described as "winning hands down" in fact given the Sorentos 33% extra size and weight I would consider that advantage pretty poor. Acceleration 0-60 is a bit more of an issue with a 3 second difference, but "real world" performance is not an issue. Now you are trying to twist the arguement to suit yourself. I'm not talking about efficiency - just look at the FACTS. Fuel consumption, service intervals, service costs, pence per mile etc etc - the X-Trail is better. I too sold a Discovery to buy an X-Trail and I am exceptionally pleased with it. If you like driving (with and without the caravan) then the X-Trail is much more car-like, is nippy and handles really well. If you want a higher driving position, cumbersome handling and performance which is more agricultural, then the Kia or Discovery fits the bill. Higher driving position, yes - to call the Kia "agricultural" in any sence is plain stupid (and, yes, I know What Car used that word). The discovery is agricultural, the kia is nothing like it at all. So all the professionals at What Car are wrong and you are right? Handling is far from the likes of older "agricultural" 4x4's and it was tuned by Porche, yes - on bad roads the ride is a little harsh but it is very well controlled. The ride is not the Sorentos best point Just shot yourself in the foot. Bob --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 04/08/2003 |
|
|||
|
"Steve Firth" wrote in message . .. Paul Hubbard wrote: Nissan X Trail Honda CRV Honda HRV None of these is particularly large, indeed I consider the Hondas to be cramped and comparable to a Suzuki Vitara. One of the Hondas (HRV) IIRC is 2x4 not 4x4 There is one trim model of HRV which is available as a 2x4. Most are 4x4. and also I think the HRV is no longer available (i.e. s/h only). AFAIK the HRV is still current and selling steadily. Of that particular bunch I'd have a look at the X-Trail. Have a look at them all. One man's medicine is another man's poison. Huw --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 26/12/03 |
|
|||
|
"Steve Firth" wrote in message .. . "Huw" wrote: There is one trim model of HRV which is available as a 2x4. Most are 4x4. Thanks, the other worry on the HRV is that the drive shafts look like pencils. Now it maybe that the drive shafts are made out of cunning Japanese Unobtanium which is much, much stronger than steel. But if they aren't, then I'd be worried about towing or off-roading with one. I am not sure the OP or anyone interested in these vehicles would wish to do either of these. They are good on rough country roads, farm lanes and muddy and moderately snowy variations of the above. Would probably make a good country reps car although it looks a bit poofy to me. Probably suits a country midwife better than a Morris 1000. Huw --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.556 / Virus Database: 348 - Release Date: 26/12/03 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|