So the Police say that he broke the law, the Department of Health say
that he broke the law, and the Union supporting the man say he broke the
law, but good old Steve Firth says he didn't.

The Police are bringing this as a test case.
Does the term "test case" mean anything to you?

What may change is the legislation itself, as a result of the
controversy surrounding the case. It will probably be brought into line
with other newer legislation (such as signs), which differ in their
definition of ambulances from the 1984 act, directly referencing an
ambulance as a vehicle conveying injured people *or* organs.

When is the actual case now anyway, last I heard it was on June 11th, I
assume it got adjourned again ?



--
Lordy