esp as ambulance purposes do not require the use of an ambulance,
something which is forgotten by people who can't read legislation
properly

I tell you what, seeing as you can read so "properly", have a go with
this little quote and see if you can comprehend what it means;

"As the law currently stands, there is no exemption from speed
limits for the carriage of blood and human organs. This was
specifically excluded from the legislation by those writing
the law."

Then obviously the law needs changing,

No it doesn't. He's wrong.


rotflmao. Be careful, if you stick your fingers any further down your
ears they'll meet in the middle


The GMB says he committed an offense - it says so on their webpage as
linked to at the start of this thread - that's good enough for me. I'll
take the word of one of the biggest legal organisations in this country
over the word of someone who think's their own opinion is the only one
that matters (that would be you, Mr Huge).

Of course, if you know more than the GMB then please inform them. I'm
sure they will be glad for the information...


--
Lordy