Because there's more to the internet than hits alone, Steve Firth
wrote:


Your inability to face facts noted.

Yadda, yadda, yadda.

And you couldn't provide any solution, just rhetoric.

No, still no proposed solution. Unless you intend to provide electricity
from hot air.

Hit air of which you an infinite supply it seems.

Your hollow rhetoric shows that you only have cat-calling from the
sidelines as an option.

What cat-calling?? Actually I went to some lengths not to do the
cat-calling bit. My comments were intended to be dispassionate
observations. And no need to be surprised by hot-air on usenet -
that's what it's for.

And why do you presume it is for me to comer up with alternative
answers? I'm just a spectator asking questions. We've already got far
too many 'experts' - the more I listen to people who reckon to have
The Answer, the deeper become my suspicions. I haven't even got as far
as defining what The Probem is yet. By all means damn me for that, but
it seems to me to be the exact opposite of head-burying. Your original
comment of "the only answer" does not fill me with optimism, because
it seems we're gonna need plenty more than one.


Like most of those who advocate changes in consumption habits, it seems
you mean everyone else except you. The day that one of you shows a
change in *your* consumption habits is the day I'll take you seriously.

This seems rather a stupid thing to say on an LPG forum.



--

Stewart Hargrave

I run on beans - laser beans


For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my name